When I started this blog during my campaign for mayor, I planned to not really talk about personal issues. Unfortunately, that plan got blown all to hell tonight. So, my friends, my citizens, I ask you to forgive the fact that for the next few lines, I'm ceeding my role as mayor, and stepping back into my role as a private citizen. So, until I'm done, if you've got a problem, call the mayor pro tempore. That's why we appointed her. (You know, honestly, the fact that I don't get to be a private citizen anymore kinda chaps at me...but...that's another issue for another day.)
Tonight, at the Franklin County Board of Commissioners meeting, Commissioner Bob Winters of Lake Royale introduced a resolution to be passed by the FCBOC in support of an amendment to the Constitution of the State of North Carolina that will, in effect, ban same sex couples from every having the right of marriage. The resolution was not on the printed agenda as provided to the public, and the members of the Board (as far as I know) were not provided a copy of this resolution prior to the meeting. Commissioner Winters read the resolution, which took about five minutes of the meeting, as it was quite lengthy, and was apparently a 'form' resolution which was provided by one of the litany of organizations opposed to full equality for GLBT citizens.
Once the resolution was read, Commissioner Rev. Sidney Dunston spoke to the Board regarding his opinion of the issue. While he noted that he personally believes that marriage is the union of a man and a woman, he also believes that such legislation is unnecessary as the State of North Carolina already has such laws on the books (currently known as the Defense of Marriage Act) and would basically be the Board entering into a political hot potato. Commissioner Winters then rebutted Commissioner Dunston's comments, and no other comments were made regarding such. Commissioner Penny McGhee-Young, representing Franklinton (which is my area, making her my representative) then asked about the first paragraph of the resolution, which was very specific regarding the opinion of the Board with respect to the definition of marriage and what it means to Franklin County and the disintegration of marriage unions is a detriment to the quality of life in Franklin County. She noted that she would prefer to have that paragraph removed, but that she was okay with the vote being put to the citizens. After that, there were no other comments.
That said, I then sat in the audience with about 100 other people who were actively avoiding looking at me while this Board of Commissioners voted 6-1 in favor of this resolution. Commissioners whom I have known my entire life, some who are good friends of my family, some who I thought I was fairly close to, all of whom I now have to work with for another two and a half years as the elected representative of my community, voted to endorse the legislation of hatred, bigotry and inequality. The lone dissent? Commissioner Sidney Dunston. Whatever your reasons, Commissioner, I thank you.
Now...you're likely wondering, why is this such a big deal to you? Well, for a number of reasons. I'm fairly confident it's no secret that I'm gay. (If you pay any attention to The Franklin Times, you're well aware. There's a reason my swearing in picture was the above the fold on January 1, 2008...and it's not because I'm so pretty. Until recently, that photo set the record for the number of comments on the Franklin Times website. Some badges we wear with pride, I suppose.) Of course, this impacts me personally. While my other half lives eight states away at the moment, what do we do when we decide we want to get married? The answer is, apparently, nothing in the State of North Carolina. What I can't get anyone to explain to me is, why is it that gay marriage scares religious straight people so much? What are you so afraid of? Are you frightened we'll be better at it? Ya'll certainly haven't managed to do a great job with it in the past 200 years. Take a look at the divorce rates. Are you afraid gays getting married will stimulate the economy? There is OVERWHELMING research to prove that if gays were able to get married, they would put over $5 billion in to the economy of this nation per year with wedding ceremonies alone. From a municipal perspective, that is municipal revenue! Or are you afraid of the 1,151 rights currently afforded to heterosexual couples that are denied to gay couples? Are you afraid I'll get more out of my tax return because I'll be able to claim head of household? Are you afraid I'll be better at being married? What is it?
And please, whatever you do, don't argue the religous aspect with me. Because I promise you, for every sin you cite with regards to sodomy, I'll throw one back at you. Shellfish anyone? I was raised BAPTIST. I know 'em all. Please take me on with that debate.
By now you know, I'm a little upset. Why? Because two hours ago, I sat in a crowded room, with full knowledge by the governing body in the room that I was the only gay person in the room, and that I am the only openly gay elected leader in Franklin County, while this vote was taken. How hard would it have been for someone to say, "Hey, just so you know, this is coming up." At least I wouldn't have been blindsided. The people in the room that were doing their best to avoid eye contact wouldn't have been so uncomfortable. And I wouldn't have had to look good friends in the eye while it happened. I will tell you, though, that tonight's actions explain a lot. I understand certain interpersonal interactions with others across the county a whole lot better now.
At this point, I can honestly say that for the first time in 32 years...I'm speechless. And that, as you know, is saying a lot.
Okay...rant over. I have more I can say. Feel free to contact me, but know that in discussing this issue, I'm not speaking as the Mayor of Franklinton...regardless of the fact that I was elected to serve, I'm still a citizen, I still get to vote (and don't you forget it), and I still get to have my own personal opinion. And NOBODY can take that away from me. NOBODY.
6 comments:
I'll admit that the way it was sprung onto the agenda was suspect, still not sure if having a matter for Franklinton on the agenda was coincidence or not.
My stance on the legal definition of marriage issue is to leave the marriage ceremony to the preachers/rabbis/dancing Elvises/whatever and get the government to just validate the legal contract of the civil union. To me that would be the only solution that would make sense to me but i'm just odd some days.
I love you Senter! :D
~Charity
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not.
-- Dr. Seuss
Wow. I don't really know what to say, except I'm sorry. Sounds like it was one heck of a meeting.
I am speechless and so, so, so sorry. This makes me ashamed to have ties to Franklin County. Know that you are loved.
Mr. Senter,
You probably don't remember me, but I was a student of yours at West Forsyth High School. I went on to Duke University and then to law school. I now practice business and corporate litigation in Los Angeles. I only provide that personal background because I believe it will give you the proper context for my response.
If you remember me, you'll recall that I am very religious, and as a consequence of my religious beliefs I oppose same-sex marriage. As a result of my profession, however, I believe I can give you a reason why I oppose it in addition to my faith.
Marriage is a civil institution as much as it is a religious one. The reason why the federal government began instituting numerous tax and legal benefits for married couples in the early 20th century is because the government recognized the importance of nuclear families on societal cohesion and development. Specifically, this idea is premised on the fact that men and women are not interchangeable. I.E. There are particular character traits, behaviors, strengths and weaknesses that are peculiar to each gender. Now you may disagree with me, but I am simply telling you what the Supreme Court has held. These differences between the genders spawned a whole host of legislation, initiatives and programs during the 20th century, whether it be something mundane like the requirement that jury venires contain a fair sampling of both men and women, or more important matters like federal protections for women in the work environment or divergent standards in the military between the sexes. Same-sex marriage blurs this legal distinction between the sexes. Blurred distinctions erode the ideological premises for many of these laws. It is important to note that a distinction is not a bad thing. Distinctions are the essence of law. I could discuss further the implications of blurring legal distinctions, but I believe that carries the point further than it needs to be carried in this forum. I only write to offer an alternative argument. Finally, if you remember me, you'll remember that I really liked you, and I really had a lot of fun in your class. I may not agree with things that you do, but if you took a look at my life, you'd say the same thing about me. We are all sinners saved by grace, and people that choose religion as a sword for hate are cowards oppressed by their own prejudices. You know me. You know I don't hate you. Rest assured there are many others out there like me, people who truly love you, but people who disagree with you for different reasons. I hope you receive this letter in the same spirit with which the letter is written- respect and friendship.
Best regards,
Mat Groseclose
Mat -
I'm having a devil of a time finding you...I can't locate you on Facebook, and Blogger won't let me write you back. Please forgive me for taking so long...and if you will, shoot me an e-mail - elic@elicsenter.com. Thanks!
Post a Comment